Showing posts with label Federal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Federal. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Trump's Budget and Syracuse Arts Organizations

Trump budget creates 'existential crisis' for Syracuse arts organizations

Syracuse Parks and Recreation's The Stan Colella All-Star Band performs in Clinton Square in 2014. The event was a part of the ArtsWeek in Downtown Syracuse's Jazz Up Your Lunch Series. (Michelle Gabel | mgabel@syracuse.com)

SYRACUSE, N.Y. -- Local arts and education groups would lose out on hundreds of thousands of dollars if President Donald Trump's budget passes Congress.
Trump's proposed budget would eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts, as well as the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Company for Public Broadcasting and the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
Together, those four agencies account for $1.02 billion in the federal budget, less than one percent of the total budget. Each channels money into Central New York's non-for-profit cultural and educational organizations.
In Syracuse, cutting the NEA would have the most visible impact. 
CNY Jazz Central Executive Director Larry Luttinger said eliminating the NEA would create an "existential crisis" for local arts organizations like his.
"The overall domino effect from this action would be devastating," he said. "It's challenging enough running an arts organization in Central New York. We don't need a tsunami."
Over the last 10 years, the NEA has awarded more than $1 million to local organizations, including CNY Jazz, CNY Arts, the Erie Canal Museum, Light Work, the Everson Museum, Syracuse Stage, the Redhouse and Syracuse Opera, among others.
Additionally, about 40 percent of the NEA's funding is given to the states to dole out. The New York State Council on the Arts, which distributes money to local arts groups, received $751,675 last year. The Council supports things like the Everson Museum, the Onondaga Historical Association and the YMCA.
Light Work, a non-for-profit group that supports photographers, has been receiving NEA grants since the 1970s. They received $40,000 this year to support an artist-in-residency program.
Executive Director Jeffrey Hoone said the money is a small part of the organization's budget, but the grant is used to leverage other investment.
"Grants are done through peer review -- you're in competition across the country," he said. "When you get a grant, it means you've met certain standard of excellence. That's important in getting other funders to give money."
Hoone added that the money also demonstrates support of the arts, which "make life worth living."
Natalie Stetson is executive director of the Erie Canal Museum, which this year received a $60,000 NEA grant to present an Erie Canal documentary in cities along the canal, including a showing in Baldwinsville. 
She said the money isn't part of the annual budget, but is used for special projects like the film -- things a small museum like hers could never afford otherwise.
Arts and culture program, she said, are always on the chopping block. Trump's recent proposal feels a little scarier, though.
"We're always asking not to cut our funding, probably since the NEA was founded," she said. "There was always a good deal of hope that representatives would listen to us. There's something in the air now that feels a little more real and a little more solid."
In all, Trump's budget would totally eliminate 19 agencies, including the NEA.
Some are well known, like the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides money for television and radio networks, like Central New York's WRVO.
Others are less familiar, like the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
In addition to supporting museums like the Erie Canal Museum, the IMLS has given millions of dollars to Syracuse University's School of Information Studies to support research and education programs for students.
Dr. Ruth Small is Meredith Professor of Information Studies at the iSchool. She said she has received more than a dozen grants from IMLS since 2003. Those grants allow her to fund research projects with a national scope.
One such project created a database of thousands of lesson plans for teaching media literacy -- how to evaluate the authenticity of information, i.e. "fake news." Those plans are available to schools across the country for free. The iSchool maintains the database.
Small said the grants have partially or fully funded tuition and work for more than 100 students. 
SU also receives less frequent grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Last year, the NEH awarded $50,400 to a Syracuse University professor to study the cultural impact of tea. Another group of professors is using a two-and-a-half-year, $29,879 grant from the NEH to create a digital cultural map of Onondaga Lake.
By Chris Baker | cbaker@syracuse.com 
Follow on Twitter 
on March 17, 2017 at 8:44 AM, updated March 17, 2017 at 10:00 AM 
http://www.syracuse.com/

Sunday, March 12, 2017

A CALL TO ACTION in Support of Nonprofit Nonpartisanship


Keeping Politics at Bay for
Charitable Nonprofits and Foundations
Oppose Efforts to Repeal or Weaken
the “Johnson Amendment”

Is it too much to ask that the charitable nonprofit and foundation community be respected and protected as the safe space from the damaging effects of partisan politics? The immediate answer from scores of 501(c)(3) leaders so far – and potentially tens of thousands of organizations – is – No, it is not too much to ask that nonpartisanship remains a cornerstone principle of what it means to be a charity or a Sign the Community Letterfoundation. By signing onto the Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship, charitable nonprofits, private foundations, religious groups, and their vast numbers of supporters can send a clear signal to Congress and the Administration that partisan politics has no place in the 501(c)(3) community. Join others from across the country to show that we intend to resist any and all efforts to weaken or repeal this longstanding protection in federal tax law that keeps 501(c)(3) organizations away from endorsing, opposing, or contributing to political candidates.

Why Nonpartisanship Matters
Nonpartisanship is a cornerstone principle that has strengthened the public’s trust of the charitable community. In exchange for enjoying tax-exempt status and the ability to receive tax-deductible contributions, 501(c)(3) organizations – charitable nonprofits, including religious congregations, and foundations – agree to not engage in “any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.” The quoted and highlighted text is often referred to as the “Johnson Amendment” because it was proposed by then-Senate Minority Leader Johnson to legislation signed by President Eisenhower in 1954.

That provision of law protects the integrity and independence of charitable nonprofits and foundations. It shields the entire 501(c)(3) community against the rancor of partisan politics so the charitable community can be a safe haven where individuals of all beliefs come together to solve community problems free from partisan divisions. It screens out doubts and suspicions regarding ulterior partisan motives of charitable organizations, as undoubtedly would occur if even just a few charitable organizations engaged in partisan politics. Nonpartisan credibility is critical to the ability of 501(c)(3) organizations to work with elected officials of all parties at the local, state, and federal levels to address community needs.

Weakening the law by allowing leaders of individual 501(c)(3) entities to endorse candidates for public office and engage in limited partisan electioneering activities would damage the integrity and effectiveness of all charitable organizations and spawn litigation as innovative partisans seek to expand gray areas in the proposed legislation. Repealing the Johnson Amendment would damage the federal Treasury as people take tax deductions for political contributions they could then funnel through charitable nonprofits, undercut fair elections by providing a loophole to avoid campaign contribution disclosure laws, and empower politicians to exert pressure for access to foundation assets and charitable funds for their own partisan campaigns rather than for the public good.

The Issue: Whether the Johnson Amendment Needs Fixing
In recent weeks, the President vowed to “get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment,” the Chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee said he intends to repeal the law as part of comprehensive tax reform, and the House Majority Whip became a lead sponsor of one of the bills to weaken the protection. That legislation (H.R.781S.264) would blur the current clear language (quoted above) that conditions tax-exempt status and the ability to receive tax-deductible contributions in part on not engaging in partisan, election-related activities for or against candidates for public office.

Proponents of the legislation, primarily a subsection of the broad religious community, generally focus on perceived restrictions on preachers who say they want to speak out about issues of the day, plus endorse candidates from the pulpit. Most commentators, however, emphasize the legal reality that charitable nonprofits, including religious congregations, already are free to speak on important matters of the day and advocate on public policy issues and legislation. Private foundations, while barred from most lobbying activities, are free to engage in public debates, promote public education efforts, and fund a wide range of issue-focused activities. Section 501(c)(3) of the federal tax code merely prohibits campaign intervention, defined to include endorsing or opposing candidates for public office, publishing or distributing statements for or against candidates, or using tax-deductible and other resources to support partisan campaign activities. See the recent Chronicle of Philanthropyarticle for a more detailed description of the arguments.

Sign the Community Letter

Who’s on the Side of Nonpartisanship?
(and opposes changes to the Johnson Amendment)
Charitable nonprofits and foundations from across the country are beginning to express strong opposition to any efforts to politicize our community by altering the tax-law ban on partisan, election-related activities. The National Council of Nonprofits has taken a strong stance in support of nonprofit nonpartisanship as have several other mainstream nonprofits and associations, including Association of Fundraising ProfessionalsBoardSourceIndependent Sector, and (so far) 23 state associations of nonprofits. Although the issue is frequently couched as a concern to some preachers, numerous faith-based organizations, such as the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious LibertyFaith Voices Arkansas,Interfaith Alliance, and North Carolina Council of Churches, have expressed strong opposition to changes in the law. Likewise, the Council on Foundations issued a strong statement in support of maintaining nonpartisanship as the hallmark of philanthropy.

Is it Legal for My Organization to Sign Onto the Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship?
As noted above, charitable nonprofits have the right to lobby on many legislative issues. Signing the Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship is consistent with that legal right. The lobbying rules for private foundations are more restrictive, but in this case organizations, such as the Council on Foundations, have determined that signing onto the letter is legal. The Council on Foundations published a statement clarifying that foundation lobbying on this issue is legal under the “self-defense” exception.

What Good Will It Do to Sign the Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship?
Nonprofit and foundation voices matter. A small minority of individuals in the religious community have made the case to some political leaders that allowing churches and charities to endorse political candidates would be good for those preachers and politicians. The truth is that the vast majority of nonprofit and foundation leaders not only oppose changing the law, but see repeal or revision of the Johnson Amendment as being very harmful to the identity, independence, and integrity of our community. As with many issues, numbers matter. The more charitable nonprofits, foundations, religious congregations, and their many supporters – accounting firms, law firms, corporations that care – that stand up for the community and their missions by supporting nonpartisanship, the stronger is the message that changing the Johnson Amendment is unpopular and viewed as destructive by real people back home. Your voice matters!

Sign the Community Letter


New York Council of Nonprofits
This newsletter on public policy issues affecting nonprofits is provided as a benefit of membership in the New York Council of Nonprofits, part of the state association network of theNational Council of Nonprofits.

Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship, National Council of Nonprofits web resources

Infographic, “Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship,” National Council of Nonprofits

Worth Quoting
“With this editorial, NPQ now adds its voice to those who resist any repeal of the Johnson Amendment, and we urge others to do the same. The nonprofit sector should assertively protect itself and the public from this baldly partisan effort.”
-- “Losing the Johnson Amendment Would Destroy the Unique Political Role of Nonprofits,” editorial, Nonprofit Quarterly, February 6, 2017, and quoting, among others, Robert P. Jones, CEO of the Public Religion Research Institute: “Church members could give tax-deductible donations to a church, which would then be used by the church to campaign for a specific candidate. It could effectively turn churches into campaign offices and pastors into party operatives.”

"Politicizing churches is not a solution to a problem – it is a problem in search of a problem.”  - “Politicize our charities and churches? No, thanks,” Amanda Tyler, Executive Director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, Religion News Service, February 9, 2017.

“[W]ith the Johnson Amendment, preachers are totally free to attack greed, support health care, wrestle with war, decry injustice and anything else at the intersection of biblical faith and public policy. We are free to preach on these critical matters which are, first of all, issues of faith planted firmly in the Bible. Preachers can go at the issues full-on – and then let the people decide who gets their vote.”
- “On religious liberty and the Johnson Amendment,” Rev. Jean Larson, ret., Missoulian (MT), February 18, 2017. The Johnson Amendment, she continues, “supports the integrity of churches. It keeps churches from being pawns of big money and restrains the partisan hijacking of our pulpits.”

“The Johnson Amendment has been the target of politicians and preachers who want to politicize pulpits. They may not own up to that fact, but the truth is they want to leverage the voting mass of congregations to turn elections in their favor. They lust for … the ability of the clergy to direct the political clout of the faithful by telling them how to vote.” “Johnson Amendment repeal would ‘destroy’ church unity,” Marv Knox, editor, The Baptist Standard (Feb. 8, 2017).

“The Johnson Amendment, thankfully … keeps the political parties out of our churches. Can you imagine if churches could become a political organ of the Republican or Democratic Parties? Can you anticipate the money and muscle that would be spent to convince church leaders to advocate for one side or the other?”
- “Why we need the Johnson Amendment,” Mathew Whoolery, instructor at Brigham Young University–Idaho, Idaho Standard Journal, February 13, 2017. Whoolery added, “I realized that my time in church, worshipping, is one of the only safe places left in my life where politics doesn’t intrude.”

Worth Reading






Government Resources
IRS Publication 1828501(c)(3) Tax Guide for Churches & Religious Organizations (Rev. 8-2015)



Copyright 2017 National Council of Nonprofits. All rights reserved.
1001 G Street NW, Suite 700 East
WashingtonDC 20001

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Nonprofit Advocacy Matters | February 9, 2015

Nonprofit Advocacy Matters banner

 
 
House to Vote on Restoring Expired Charitable Giving Incentives
The House of Representatives is expected to debate and vote this week on a package of charitable giving incentive bills that were recently approved individually by the House Ways and Means Committee. Using the same name as a similar bill from last July, the America Gives More Act of 2015 (H.R. 644), includes bills that would extend and make permanent these giving incentives: the IRA charitable rollover (H.R. 637), an enhanced and expanded deduction of food inventories (H.R. 644), and an expanded tax deduction to promote donation of land for conservation purposes (H.R. 641). The provisions were briefly restored towards the end of last year, but expired again on December 31, 2004. The bill package will also include a proposal to streamline the foundation excise tax by setting a single tax rate of 1 percent on net investment income for private foundations (H.R. 640).
 
Each of the separate components was approved by the House tax committee by a vote along party lines, but received vocal support from almost all committee members. Democratic members, however, explained that they were voting against the bills because the provisions 1) are not paid for with offsetting tax hikes or spending cuts, and 2) should not be considered in a piecemeal fashion, but as part of the negotiations that produce comprehensive tax reform. The White House may issue a veto statement for the same reasons in advance of the vote, which is likely to occur on Wednesday or Thursday.
 
 
President Outlines Spending, Policy Priorities
The federal budget and appropriations process officially began last week with the release of President Obama’s $4 trillion budget proposal for fiscal year 2016. In addition to making spending requests for each federal department, agency, and program, the President’s budget blueprint proposes making several policy changes, including ending sequestration, which it calls “mindless austerity,” and spending $74 billion more than permitted under the Budget Control Act of 2011. He also recommends increasing taxes on bequests of property and again, for the seventh time, urges Congress to limit the value of itemized deductions (including the charitable deduction) for higher-income taxpayers. In the coming weeks, congressional hearings will review and challenge many of the proposals in the President’s budget blueprint. Over the spring and summer, Congress is responsible for turning policy discussions into line-item spending decisions that must be enacted into law before the new fiscal year starts on October 1, 2015. For more information, see “Federal Budget ‘Sausage-Making’ Season Opens.”
 
 
 
Pennsylvania at the Epicenter of Debate on Nonprofit Property-Tax Exemption
Pennsylvania has become the epicenter on the debate over nonprofit property-tax exemption as some lawmakers seek to overturn a court decision regarding the meaning of the phrase "institutions of purely public charity," while municipalities and others look for opportunities to take resources dedicated to nonprofit missions. All of the many issues were raised at a hearing last week before the Pennsylvania Senate tax-writing committee that heard testimony on a pending amendment to the Pennsylvania constitution to recognize the General Assembly’s sole authority to establish what qualifies an organization as a charitable nonprofit for property taxation purposes. That amendment passed the legislature last year, but under Pennsylvania law must be passed again by the newly-elected legislature and then be approved by the voters before it can become effective. Municipalities and their associations are lobbying against the amendment, and sympathetic lawmakers pressed their argument that some nonprofits should be required to pay property taxes and/or make “voluntary” payments in lieu of taxes. Read, “From the Fault Line on Nonprofit Property-Tax Exemptions,” for more on the hearing, including the testimony of David L. Thompson, VP of Public Policy for the National Council of Nonprofits, regarding the challenges nonprofits face in Pennsylvania and elsewhere.
 
Kentucky Takes Step Toward Government-Nonprofit Contracting Reform
A concurrent resolution introduced in Kentucky calls for the creation of a Government Nonprofit Contracting Task Force for the purpose of identifying ways to eliminate redundant, unreasonable, or unnecessary laws, regulations, or policies that negatively affect nonprofit government contracting or funding. The task force, to be made up of representatives from the legislature, state agencies, and nonprofits, would be required to issue a preliminary report in October and a final report a year later, offering recommendations and any proposed legislative changes. The Kentucky Nonprofit Network (KNN), the state association of nonprofits in the commonwealth, supports the task force as an “opportunity for government and nonprofits to work together to identify solutions for contracting relationships that would allow both to benefit from increased efficiency and financial savings - resulting in better services being delivered to the citizens of the Commonwealth.” Read the KNN fact sheet on the concurrent resolution and the National Council of Nonprofits report, Investing for Impact: Government-Nonprofit Task Forces Produce Results for Taxpayers (April 2013).
 
 
Philadelphia’s Wage Floor Raises Familiar Challenge for Nonprofits
Some nonprofits providing services under government contracts and grants are seeking exemptions from Philadelphia’s new $12 per hour wage mandate for city contractors on the grounds that their written agreements do not provide funding for the added costs. The city’s Commissioner for the Department of Human Services (DHS), whose agency has the most contracts with providers affected by the wage increase, agrees with the nonprofits and supports temporary waivers for nonprofits performing under DHS contracts until contract renewal time. Similar concerns have been expressed elsewhere in the country when wage mandates, such as an increase in the federal or state minimum wage, are considered. Last month, for example, CalNonprofits stressed the need for policymakers “to provide a longer phase-in schedule for nonprofits in order to provide time to re-negotiate government contracts that reimburse at minimum wage levels, allowing nonprofits to maintain delivery of critical human services.”
 
Utah Considers Improving Nonprofit Regulations, Disclosures
The Utah Legislature is considering a regulatory clean-up bill that addresses several simmering issues for nonprofits. The bill would repeal a statute authorizing the state to invade the privacy of nonprofit officers by looking into their personal accounts, remove requirements about nonprofit bylaws, repeal existing and delineate new auditing requirements, and create a $25,000 floor for nonprofits that receive government funding to report to the State Auditor's Office. This last item would lessen the adverse impact of a bill passed last year requiring nonprofits that receive “state money” to submit redundant and unnecessary reports.
 
 
Tax Exemption Preserved in Florida
A Florida county assessor’s efforts to force a nonprofit blood bank onto the property tax rolls has been blocked by the Alachua County Value Adjustment Board, which ruled that LifeSouth Community Blood Centers’ work is charitable. The assessor had taken the position that LifeSouth charged for each pint of blood sold to hospitals and thus did not provide charity to individuals who cannot pay. The Value Adjustment Board rejected the assessor’s narrow view of charity and deemed the work of the nonprofit blood bank essential to reducing the burden of government, a component in the Florida property-tax exemption law. According to the Gainesville (FL) Sun, for-profit blood centers in the 1970s were paying individuals to donate blood, which many believed led to hepatitis tainting the nation’s blood supply. The National Blood Policy of 1973 promoted an all-volunteer donor system. In 1974, the Gainesville Civitan Club started Civitan Regional Blood Center, which later became LifeSouth.
 
Localities Support Nonprofits with Revenue Surpluses
The work of nonprofits may benefit from improving tax revenues and local government budgets in at least two communities located on opposite sides of the country. Portland, Oregon is planning to provide additional grants totaling $1.4 million to 16 cultural nonprofits, thanks to new funds from the local arts tax and a surplus in the city’s budget. The seacoast community of Tybee Island, Georgia is considering increasing its support for the work of local nonprofits, such as the Historical Society, by increasing the share of a hotel/motel tax that is made available to cultural and community development organizations. The Tybee Island Mayor is proposing this increased funding because  nonprofits  act to “enhance the quality of life for people who live on the island year round.”
 
 
 
 
Talking a Stand, Publicly
It is one thing to express strong views about an issue affecting nonprofit missions in the privacy of the board room or among like-minded people. To really advance the mission, however, it is necessary to give voice, publicly, to those views. Three state association leaders did just that in recent weeks through articles in their local newspapers. Each took public stands for their missions and the work of nonprofits:
 
Mary Ellen Jackson, President & CEO of the New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits, penned “My Turn: Taxing nonprofits is a lose-lose situation,” published in the Concord (NH) Monitor, on February 4. New Hampshire legislators are once again considering a bill mandating that nonprofit charitable organizations with revenue greater than $10 million be taxed under the state’s Business Enterprise Tax. Jackson explains that the bill, “if passed, will result in a loss in revenue for the state, a loss in revenue for charitable organizations, and, most importantly, a loss for people and communities.” She points out that “nonprofits such as Easter Seals, Goodwill, Gateways Community Services, Nashua’s Harbor Homes and others who serve our most vulnerable families will need to come up with revenue to pay this hefty tax,” forcing them “to either curb services or raise more money each year to pay this tax.” 
 
In neighboring Maine, Scott Schnapp, Executive Director of the Maine Association of Nonprofits, is taking issue, publicly, with the Governor’s plan of repealing property-tax exemption for property owned by tax-exempt nonprofits. In “Another View: Hospitals aren’t the only nonprofits affected by LePage’s budget plan,” in the Portland (ME) Press Herald, January 29, Schnapp helps nonprofits and the general public understand how the proposal to allow municipalities to tax nonprofits with property valued above $500,000 “would undoubtedly result in staffing cuts that would diminish services for vulnerable populations and reduce programs that Maine residents rely on and value.” He also corrected the misinformation that the proposal would only apply permit “taxing large nonprofits,” pointing out that the Governor’s plan would also affect “social service agencies, land trusts, educational institutions and organizations that provide healthy outlets for young people, to name just a few.”
 
Readers may recall that the Maine Governor asserted in November that Maine nonprofits “don’t pay their fair share,” and that “they are takers, not givers.” Schnapp and the Maine Association of Nonprofits have been aggressive in pushing back against this mindset and this proposal.
 
 
Heading west from the Northeast, we take note of the article “Charity Inc.: Advocacy for nonprofits,” (Oklahoma City The Journal Record, February 4) by Marnie Taylor, President & CEO, Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits. Writing at the start of the Oklahoma legislative session, Taylor encourages “all nonprofits, large and small, to dedicate time and resources to advocacy and public policy.” Here’s more good advice: “Nonprofit leaders and volunteers should be able to show the public and our policymakers how their missions not only affect the lives they serve but how they save taxpayer dollars, help the economy and improve the state’s standards compared with other states.”

These three leaders are modelling the way for advancing the missions of nonprofits by advocating through the news media. 
 
 
Federal Issues
  • Charitable Giving Incentives
  • Budget and Spending
State and Local Issues
  • Property Tax Policy: PA
  • Government-Nonprofit Task Force: KY
  • Wage Mandates: CA, PA
  • Nonprofit Regulation and Disclosure: UT
  • Property Tax Exemption: FL
  • Arts Funding: GA, OR
Advocacy in Action
 
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 
 
Nonprofit VOTE Webinar
Voter engagement takes planning. Learn about general tactics, strategies, and resources to support your efforts, while developing a 2015 voter engagement timeline for your organization. Register now.
 
 
Worth Reading
On OMB Uniform Guidance
One Small Step for Government, One Giant Leap for Nonprofits,” by Tim Delaney, President & CEO, National Council of Nonprofits, published in GuideStar newsletter, February 5, 2015, explaining how an assist from a new federal law may help nonprofits both recover more funds and bust the Overhead Myth.
 
Survey, Reform, Repeat,“ Beth Bowsky, Policy Specialist for Government-Nonprofit Contracting at the National Council of Nonprofits, published on Nonprofit Finance Fund blog, February 5, 2015, using the OMB Uniform Guidance that calls for more payments to nonprofits as an example to demonstrate the importance of data for nonprofit advocacy.
 
On the Federal Budget Process
Mr. Obama and Congress should work to end sequestration,” Washington Post editorial, February 1, 2015, calling for an end to the arbitrary, across-the-board budget cuts, while reminding readers of how the sequestration budget gimmick came about and stressing the need for policymakers to embrace entitlement and tax reform.
 
Survey Worth Taking
Nonprofit Finance Fund's seventh annual nationwide survey examining the state of the nonprofit sector. The results help illustrate the vitality of the sector in your state and across the country, define the challenges that we all face, and provide information that advances our collective advocacy work. Please take the survey and share it with other nonprofits in your network! 
 
 
Worth Quoting
“Many nonprofits provide needed community services that the government does not. Shelters for those seeking to escape domestic violence provide a safe place to go. Programs at the local YMCA might keep kids in school and away from crime and seniors active and out of the hospital. Land trusts preserve and maintain open space for recreation, wildlife and aesthetics. Many nonprofits, especially museums, theaters and musical groups, are touted to visitors and potential residents as cultural draws to communities.”
- “Taxing nonprofits ‘neither feasible nor desirable’,” Maine Bangor Daily News editorial, February 3, 2015, expressing strong opposition to the Maine Governor’s proposal to tax charitable nonprofits, and quoting the Council of Nonprofits’ David L. Thompson: “Local budget holes are smaller because of the work nonprofits do.”
 
Worth Studying
Senate Democrats letter to Hatch on Tax Reform
Senate Finance Committee Democrats Outline Principles for Bipartisan Tax Reform, a letter from the 12 Democratic Senators on the Committee to Chairman Hatch (R-UT) laying out what will be needed to craft tax reform that is truly bipartisan.
 
Ratios in the News
Legislators in different states have fewer or more constituents to represent. Presuming that fewer is preferred, here is how states’ Houses of Representatives measure up (excluding the unicameral Nebraska legislature):
 
#1: New Hampshire
(3,309:1 ratio)
 
#49: California
(479,157:1 ratio)
 
 
Nonprofit Events
Share this newsletter with your staff, board, and nonprofit colleagues
 
 
 
 
Did you receive this email from a friend? Sign up now to receive this free e-newsletter every other Monday.
© Copyright 2015 National Council of Nonprofits. All rights reserved 
1200 New York Avenue, NW | Suite 700 | Washington, DC 20005 | www.councilofnonprofits.org
 
This message was sent to amarietta@nycon.org from:
National Council of Nonprofits | info@councilofnonprofits.org | 1200 New York Ave NW Suite 700 | Washington, DC 20005 United States
OutMarket
 

Click here to report this email as spam.



This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com